«Let the wicked be ashamed, and let them be silent in the grave.
These ominous words, slashed from the pages of a book of Psalms, are the last threat that the darling of London society, Sir Edward Grey, receives from his killer. Before he can show them to Nicholas Brisbane, the private inquiry agent he has retained for his protection, Sir Edward collapses and dies at his London home, in the presence of his wife, Julia, and a roomful of dinner guests.
Prepared to accept that Edward’s death was due to a longstanding physical infirmity, Julia is outraged when Brisbane visits and suggests that Sir Edward has been murdered. It is a reaction she comes to regret when she discovers the damning paper for herself, and realizes the truth.
Determined to bring her husband’s murderer to justice, Julia engages the enigmatic Brisbane to help her investigate Edward’s demise. Dismissing his warnings that the investigation will be difficult, if not impossible, Julia presses forward, following a trail of clues that lead her to even more unpleasant truths, and ever closer to a killer who waits expectantly for her arrival.»
While throwing a dinner party for a few guests, Lady Julia Grey sees her husband collapse at her feet. Though still a young man, no one is particularly shocked to see him die a couple of hours later, due to a chronic family infirmity that had always plagued him. Trouble begins when she receives a surprise visit from Sir Nicholas Brisbane, who was apparently working for her deceased husband as an investigator, trying to discover who was sending him death threats. Lady Julia cannot believe that someone had anything against her husband, London’s society sweetheart could not have been murdered, as Sir Nicholas suggests. But one day while finally cleaning out her husband’s study she’s horrified to find, hidden within his desk, one of the mentioned death threats. So Lady Julia concludes that maybe Sir Nicholas wasn’t entirely wrong, maybe there was indeed someone who wanted to murder Sir Edward Grey. Who could it be? And why?
This book grabbed me right from the first sentence, “To say I met Nicholas Brisbane over my husband’s dead body is not entirely accurate. Edward, it should be noted, was still twitching upon the floor.”. What a magnificent way to start a mystery book, I thought, but the problem was the rest of the story didn’t live up to that very first sentence. Lady Julia comes from a liberal family, her mother died when she was a young girl and her father believes in giving women their independence. While her sister’s are all interesting and distinct characters, especially Portia, one of the best secondary characters I’ve met in a while, a woman who has the courage to expose to the world that she is gay and lives with another woman. Lady Julia, our heroine comes out as plain, uninteresting, too innocent almost to the extreme of stupidity, while the author tries to tell us she’s an independent and intelligent young woman, no one as intelligent as she was described would let herself be drugged on purpose or ask her butler’s permission to search her own house.
If Lady Julia left me indifferent, Sir Nicholas was quite the opposite, I took an immediate dislike to his character, he seemed cold and arrogant, and while those characteristics can be attractive on certain heroes, this wasn’t the case. To me, the author tried too hard to make him mysterious, to give him that dark aura that is sometimes seductive, at times I thought I was looking at a cheap copy of Sherlock Holmes, he even plays the violin for Pete’s sake. Oh and that “secret” thing was a tiny bit overboard, not very realistic and completely out of place.
The mystery was mildly interesting, though it takes second place to Lady Julia’s life, thoughts, doubts, problems, maybe if she did something instead of just roaming around playing dress up, we could have a better story. Even the resolution was anticlimactic, I was expecting a family secret, someone wanting the family’s money and murdering everyone for it, I don’t know, something that made it worthwhile reading 600 pages for, I’m sorry to say that was a poor excuse for a villain.
I’ve heard the second book is a lot better and I’ll probably give it a try, but I sure hope it has a lot more scenes with Portia and the crow or I’ll be very disappointed! :-P This was my first book read for the Victorian Challenge, still two more to review and three others to read. I’d better get to it!
Rating: 



(3/5)
Challenges: A to Z Challenge, Victorian Challenge










1 trackback
12 Comments and Counting…
Excellent review, Miss Picky, even if I did like the book. The second is much better but the third didn’t live to my expectations…
Love your review Ana, I didn’t dislike Brisbane as much as you did but the end result was the same. I found the second book much better and I have yet to read the third one.
Just to say something totally un-important, I like the cover of the book ;o)
I have the book on my shelf but first I’m reading others…I enjoyed your review though. I guess I’ll have to try and see what my opinion will be afterward… Oh, have you end up the Anne Stuart Read-a-Fest challenge?
Is this still Ana O.? I’ve been confused, trying to go to cosylittleworld.com and ending up here! I hope this is still you, I’m updating my reader feeds!
Janicu, still the same person here, just a new layout! ;-)
Nefertiri, I’m still doing the Anne Stuart Read-a-Fest, I just need to arrange things over here.
Oh! Ok…no problem. I was just wondering if it was still up because of your change to this new blog :)
I agree with your points. I disliked Brisbane, I thought he was too much. I like my heroes to be dark, handsome and tortured, but he was way too much of those things. Plus, he came across as rather possessive and arrogant. Not exactly favorite traits.
I’ve heard the books get better and I’ve read the first few chapters of the second book; it did seem better. A lot better. ^__^
Looking forward for more reviews.
Though I must say that I am entirely new to this column, I warrant that a bit of a differing opinion would not be badly taken at this time. I would like to say that I have read Silent in the Grave twice. Once within 48hrs and the second in 12. I thoroughly enjoyed the writing and the characters. And contrary to many of the posts so far, I am more than enamored by Brisbane. I find the creativity used to explain his origins refreshing. It adds color to his rather darker side and provides a weakness, for all our heroes must have at least one. His dark character juxtaposed with an inbred desire to help humanity is thrilling, quite a different field from Sherlock Holmes. Sherlock Holmes is not described as a person who narrows his eyes and bares his teeth, he is a proper Englishman. Brisbane is not nor would I have wanted him to be. He is described as a real man, with improper desires and a temper and whereas Holmes knew everything about everything, Brisbane does not.
The story wasn’t rushed, it took its time and though it was surely a long read, it was almost required because of the character development. And though I wish to have my heroines a bit stronger than Lady Julia Grey, for I thought her a bit slow in the upkeep, I appreciated her growth within the story. I just hope that her family does not disappear into the background in the course of the series. They contributed greatly and I wonder how the author will balance the mystery and internal growth of Lady Julia in the next novels. It was a charming story with faults, yes, but non that could not be dealt with over the course of the series. It is one of my favorite debut novels to date and I have ordered the entire series solely based on the impression the first book left on me.
Myra, thanks for leaving your heartfelt opinion! :-)
One of the things I like about reviewing books online are the different opinions each of us have about the same book, it can usually lead to very interesting discussions. Wouldn’t it be extremely boring if all of us enjoyed the same books, authors, etc?
The story wasn’t rushed, I agree with you there, but I felt there wasn’t much character development. We follow Lady Julia from day to day, but do we get to know her at all? Is she any different from the woman who we meeet at the beginning of the book? Do we know what her future plans are? Usually we see our heroine grow, learn, and with this book I felt Lady Julia was much the same person.
I just finished Only to Deceive by Tasha Alexander (if you haven’t yet you should try her books!), and contrarily to Lady Julia, Emily changes, grows and blossoms, we notice she’s a completely different person and that the whole experience had an effect on her. I don’t know why but I was able to empathise with the characters in a way that I couldn’t with Silent in the Grave!
Differences apart, I hope you’ll continue to visit me and leaving your comments!
LOL I’m having great fun reading all these comments because before I read it I found mostly rave reviews of it whereas now I found other opinions too. I quite like that there are different opinions, while we are sometimes surprised that someone is left cold but a story we adore it’s a fact of life that if we all liked the same things the world would a dull place indeed.
Having said that I have to agree that there’s not much character development for Lady Julia, or at least not as much as I like (I concur about Lady Emily) and even if I found book 2 a vast improvement on this one I think it was much more due to the fast paced action than the characters. I plan on reading book 3 somewhere in the near future and I hope both Brisbane and Julia improve… or else that we may have an action filled story again.